A principal focus of the Santa Barbara Institute's integrative research program
is what is traditionally called “practice”—the pragmatic study
and cultivation of human flourishing or well-being, a topic that is rapidly
gaining attention in the new field of “positive psychology.” The
roots of this concept can be traced back to the ancient Greek notion of eudaimonia,
commonly translated as “genuine happiness.” This term was later
adopted into the Christian tradition by Augustine, who glossed it as “truth-given
joy.” Understood in this way, it is closely analogous to the classical
Indian term ananda, referring to the bliss that is innate to the deepest dimension
of consciousness.
In the modern context, this may be understood as a state of well-being or human
flourishing that stems from one’s own mind when the mind is in a state
of healthy balance. Thus, such happiness is quite distinct from the transient
pleasures that are directly aroused by pleasurable sensory and intellectual
stimuli or drugs. Most notably, this state of contentment is not the result
of finding distraction from misery through some kind of self-indulgence. Rather,
it is the fundamental bliss that arises in experiencing things as they are.
The mental balance that gives rise to such bliss may be understood to have
four components: motivational balance, attentional balance, cognitive balance,
and emotional balance.
Motivational balance pertains to the cultivation of healthy desires and motivations
that are centered on the pursuit of genuine happiness, as opposed to superficial,
transient pleasures.
Three types of imbalances may be identified and remedied: motivational deficit,
hyperactivity, and dysfunction. When the mind succumbs to a motivational deficit
imbalance, the person falls into an apathetic loss of desire for happiness and
its causes. In cases of motivational hyperactivity, the mind is dominated by
obsessive desires that obscure the reality of the present moment. And motivational
dysfunction refers to the arousal of desires for things that are not conducive
to one’s own or others’ well-being.
There are correctives for addressing motivational imbalance and achieving motivational
balance:
- Apathy can be remedied by recognizing the possibility of genuine happiness.
- Obsessive desires can be calmed with the cultivation of contentment.
- Mistaken desires can be abandoned by recognizing the true causes of genuine
happiness as distinct from the causes that make us vulnerable to suffering.
Attentional balance is a state in which the mind is free of the hyperactive
extreme of agitation, the attentional deficit of dullness, and dysfunctional
attention that is applied in unhealthy ways.
Scientific study in this area is especially urgent in today’s world,
where there is a growing epidemic of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders
(ADHD). While drug therapy is often necessary in the treatment of such disorders,
few people regard it as an optimal, or totally satisfactory, form of therapy.
We clearly need to develop other forms of intervention, not only to counteract
the disorders, but also to prevent them from arising in the first place.
In speaking of the importance of healthy, balanced attention, the philosopher
William James comments, “The power of voluntarily attending is the point
of the whole procedure. Just as a balance turns on its knife-edges, so upon
it our moral destiny turns.”
The faculty of sustained, voluntary attention plays a particularly crucial
role in education. More than a century ago, James presented us with the following
challenge: “The faculty of voluntarily bringing back a wandering attention,
over and over again, is the very root of judgment, character, and will. An education
which should improve this faculty would be the education par excellence. But
it is easier to define this ideal than to give practical directions for bringing
it about.”
The development of tangible techniques to “bring it about” is one
of the areas to which the Santa Barbara Institute is most deeply committed.
Cognitive balance refers to apprehending reality as it is. A common characteristic
of a cognitive hyperactivity disorder is the inability to distinguish between
one’s own conceptual projections and the perceivable world of direct
experience. In cases of such cognitive imbalance, projection and perception
are commonly conflated. While this is most conspicuous in the mentally ill,
it is to a lesser degree all too prevalent among people who are considered healthy
– people who, in Freud’s terms, suffer from only “normal neuroses.”
A cognitive deficit disorder entails the denial of, or simply an inability
to note, internal or external phenomena that are presented to one’s senses,
and cognitive dysfunction occurs whenever one’s way of perceiving or conceiving
of reality is distorted by physical or mental aberrations.
At the Santa Barbara Institute studies will be conducted and classes held on
methods and disciplines for enhancing cognitive balance, especially through
training in mindful discernment. Such training may be instrumental in treating
the mentally ill as well as in training “normal” individuals to
achieve exceptional degrees of mental health and well-being.
Emotional balance is crucial to any understanding of mental health. Emotional
imbalances fall into three categories: emotional deficit, hyperactivity, and
dysfunction.
The Institute will examine the nature of destructive and constructive emotions:
How do they arise, and what are their distinguishing characteristics? What impact
do they have on our overall well-being as individuals and as members of society?
Practice will be undertaken to explore pragmatic ways in which destructive emotions
can be attenuated and constructive emotions cultivated.
|